The Language of Social Justice
- jrdreistadt
- Nov 27, 2012
- 1 min read
In social justice conversations and communications, how can we use language that is simultaneously 1) disruptive and 2) constructive that also 3) meets the litmus test of no conflicting or competing implicit assumptions? Should social justice language strive toward meeting these three criteria in order to be effective?
See my handout from a recent presentation for some more thoughts on this topic.
Recent Posts
See AllWhen our internal frequency resonates with that of our environment, we can ease into and flow through any situation. Change inside leads...
When we talk about freedom, we are usually not specific about the exact type of freedom we are referencing. Freedom exists, or does not,...
I talk about progressive change a lot, yet that idea does not fully capture my ideas about how change occurs. I like the word progressive...
Comments